FutureWeapons on Discovery Channel

Shawn Merrow · Unread post by **Shawn Merrow** » Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:25 am

Has anyone seen the new show on the Discovery Channel called FutureWeapons? Its a show hosted by a ex-Navy SEAL about cutting edge weapons. Its airs on Wednesday night (after Mythbusters) and repeats on Sunday afternoon. I have only seen the first episode and thought it was rather interesting. It covered the Javelin missile, a new Israeli firearm that can shoot around corners, a new German mobile artillery gun and the F-35. It looks like it could be a good source for idea for Modern RECON.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:39 pm

Sounds interesting, I'll have to keep an eye out for when it hits Discovery Channel Canada.

Though I know a fair bit about most of that stuff allready.

Post Count 10 000 - 32

jedi078 · Unread post by **jedi078** » Mon May 01, 2006 4:54 am

the_redstar_swl wrote:Its an OK show, The facts are a bit off and the guy won't shut up with buzzwords (IIRC he called a Predator UAV an "Assassin" or something like that, 6 times in five minutes) but its worth watching for the footage.

Is the "guy that won't shut up" the same out of work USN Pilot from the "Practical to Tactical" show?

Shawn Merrow · Unread post by **Shawn Merrow** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:11 am

One thing I do like is they are not just focusing on US hardware.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Thu May 11, 2006 1:04 pm

Who Ellis? He should know the difference on that if he was Navy, even if he was a pilot.

Shawn Merrow · Unread post by **Shawn Merrow** » Fri May 12, 2006 4:03 am

The host is Richard Machowicz an ex-Navy SEAL not a pilot.

Kalinda · Unread post by **Kalinda** » Fri May 26, 2006 12:33 am

The problem I have with the show is that it seems like an hour long ad for the weapons they future. Nothing bad or negative is said about the gear at all. (at least in the episodes I've seen.)

For example, when they talked about Metalstorm, it was all about the devastating firepower and the ROF of a million rounds a minute. Not one word was said about the fact that the systems run out of ammo in about two seconds at full ROF, or the fact that the things are very slow to reload. (the pistol is quick, but not the grenade launcher and such.)

The whole thing just feels like an excuse to look at cool toys, rather then a serious attempt to talk about cutting edge weapons.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Fri May 26, 2006 9:23 am

Well, really, when it coems to TV shows and new goodies, they are really just infomercials anyway.

Oh and it's a Tavor

Grey Death · Unread post by **Grey Death** » Fri May 26, 2006 10:21 am

Does the Tavor share any comonality with the Vektor CR-21?
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as26-e.htm

Rockwolf66 · Unread post by **Rockwolf66** » Fri May 26, 2006 5:51 pm

http://world.guns.ru/assault/as30-e.htm

http://world.guns.ru/assault/as26-e.htm

After comparing the designs, I have to say nope.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Sat May 27, 2006 9:05 am

Not that I was aware of, though the Israelis and South African's arms developmnt programs have intermingled several times in the past so I wouldn't be surprised if the design teams of both weapons had worked together on other projects.

Shawn Merrow · Unread post by **Shawn Merrow** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:02 pm

New episodes will start airing Monday, Jan 15 9:00pm ET/PT.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:22 am

Though it does seem at times the host doesn't know the difference between 7.62x39 and 7.62x51.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:09 pm

The difference is considerable when it comes to muzzle energy, effective range, armour penetration and weapons compatability.

He was a SEAL, so familiarity with a variety of infantry small arms and their capabilities would seem almost essential to me.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:58 pm

Which is why it annoys me so much that he seems unable to differentiate them.

jedi078 · Unread post by **jedi078** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:53 pm

Jefffar wrote:Though it does seem at times the host doesn't know the difference between 7.62x39 and 7.62x51.

He might be explaining things to the audience.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:55 pm

Yes but when he refers to an AK-47 as firing a .308 (ie 7.62 NATO round) it sort of diminishes his credibility.

In short, he comes across to me as a defence industry hypeman rather than as any serious analyst of military hardware.

Grey Death · Unread post by **Grey Death** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:29 pm

Jefffar wrote:Yes but when he refers to an AK-47 as firing a .308 (ie 7.62 NATO round) it sort of diminishes his credibility.

In short, he comes across to me as a defence industry hypeman rather than as any serious analyst of military hardware.

You got it right on the nose. All he is, is a hypeman. They call the show future weapons, in one of the episodes I saw he and, Ronnie Barrett owner of Barrett Manufacturing are firing a Barrett Model82A1/M107. You know the first model of rifle Ronnie built when he formed the company in 1982. Not exactly a future gun. Dont get me wrong I love seeing things blasted with a .50. Its just not new.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:33 pm

The episode with the Armscor Grenade launcher was my favourite.

He some how turned the M32 into the latest in weapons. The "6 Pack Attack" as he called it was some how silent, deadly and capable of firing a variety of unique special purpose rounds.

Except that grenade launcher has been in production for 20 years or more and is a standard 40 mm grenade launcher firing standard 40 mm grenades witht he same performance as can be extracted out of the M203. The only difference is it carries 6 greandes and replaces the soldier's primary weapon isntead of attaches to it.

Grey Death · Unread post by **Grey Death** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:10 pm

You would think if they were going to talk about a "future weapon" from Barrett. They would show the XM109 25mm payload rifle. Which you can see here. Barrett used to have it on their site. But no longer do. Which leads me to wonder is it because they think the rifle has no civilian usage and has removed it. Or because they are haveing problems with it. So they are just doing away with it?

Besides if they want to show impressive future rifles. Show the Steyr IWS2000. Chambered for 15.2mm Steyr APFSDS. (Armor Peircing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot) That can penetrate 40mm of RHA (rolled homogenous steel armour). Its supposed to be able to pentrate any modern APC's walls at a 1000 meters.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:42 pm

It might be because the 25 mm ammunition for the 25 mm rifle and a number of other development projects got their budgets cut to fund the war.

Jefffar · Unread post by **Jefffar** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:34 pm

the 25 mm cartridge is msotly an anti-infantry weapon / anti-vehicle weapon. Armoured vehicles are realy at the edge of it's target profile

Svartalf · Unread post by **Svartalf** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:49 pm

that 25mm baby is touted/designed as anti infantry? Wouldn't that be completely overkill? Plus, with a whopping 33lb gun, it's use would not only be reserved to elite marksmen, but to specifically emplaced ones not expected to have to move much (unlike basic snipers who get into position, snipe a few targets, and get away to commit more mayhem elsewere before the enemy can get at them). I can't see that thing having wide distribution, even as designated marksman squad level weapon.

Grey Death · Unread post by **Grey Death** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:52 pm

svartalf wrote:that 25mm baby is touted/designed as anti infantry? Wouldn't that be completely overkill? Plus, with a whopping 33lb gun, it's use would not only be reserved to elite marksmen, but to specifically emplaced ones not expected to have to move much (unlike basic snipers who get into position, snipe a few targets, and get away to commit more mayhem elsewere before the enemy can get at them). I can't see that thing having wide distribution, even as designated marksman squad level weapon.

More than likely it would fire different kinds of ammo allowing it to take on different targets. HE, for anti-infantry, AP for hard targets. Not unlike how the South African Mechem NTW-20, and the Croatain RT-20 can be used. Except the NTW-20, RT-20 fire full power 20mm cannon rounds. As oppossed to the XM-109 reduced size cartridges.

GreenGhost · Unread post by **GreenGhost** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:45 pm

Future Weapons is a pretty good show, but I have a hard time watching it very often considering the guy that hosts the show is a putz. He continuosly does a lot of nodding as if he understands the concepts of the weapons or armor that they are talking about on any particular show, but while things are being explained to him he commonly has the glazed look in his eyes of a kid that's called on in school that doesn't know the answer. They need to have a host that can actually keep up with everything.

Like I said- the show is pretty good, but the host is an idiot- lol.

GreenGhost · Unread post by **GreenGhost** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:00 pm

duck-foot wrote:Well if R.Lee Emry wasnt already hosting Mail Call.
I say Richard Marcinko ( former seal, rouge warrior books aurther) he rights good books and my grandfather a former frog-man (same thing as a seal) meet him he knows his stuff. not to charismatic, but i want a guy taht knows what he is talking about and doesnt have the IQ of a shoe string.

I know what you mean. I'm not sure if I know who Richard Marcinko is, but I'm sure he'd be a Hell of a lot better than who they have now.

Shawn Merrow · Unread post by **Shawn Merrow** » Fri Feb 16, 2007 4:20 am

The latest episode was interesting in that it was in my area. It was a shame no one told him how to say Yakima. I do agree he can be annoying at times but at least they got someone with military experience.

GreenGhost · Unread post by **GreenGhost** » Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:53 am

When he narates the opening of the show he states that he is a former SEAL, but that doesn't make him less a moron. Hell- I knew some Recon buddies that I thought were some real morons :lol:

GreenGhost · Unread post by **GreenGhost** » Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:06 pm

You've got that right :lol: