You probably need to stop using "nuclear" and "fire" in the same sentence.Crazy Lou wrote:I know there needs to be combustibles nearby for nukes to cause fire, but I'm saying since fire sponge gets damage variable with the power of the fire, and I figured nuclear fire is MD and worse than "normal" MD fire (like from a flamethrower) so would the fire caused by the nuke when sponged up allow a more powerful blast than a "burning house or area of forest fire" sized fire (which is lots of normal fire in a 350-750 (lvls 7-15) foot radius). Well since MD is x100 as bad a "normal" fire, and nukes get a 50' blast radius, that'd be like absorbing 5000' of normal fire with the spell. So i was just asking in that event would more damage be done? I know that's circumstantial and not even terribly munchy, but I figured this was a thread in which I could ask in passing
The Dx100 damage from a Nuke is damage from the Nuclear reaction itself, not from any fire, even if combustibles are in range. Sorry, but there's not really all that much "fire" in a Nuke, and there's definitely no way that a normally fire-proof creature can soak it up anyway; the Burster or Fire Elemental or what-have-you would have his/her/its own hands full getting destroyed at the molecular level...or getting squashed by the rapidly following Blast Wave.
Please realize in passing that most combustible objects in the range of the nuclear flash at Ground Zero (and a good deal beyond it) aren't actually burned...they are vaporized..