mystic knight vs vampire

Ley Line walkers, Juicers, Coalition Troops, Samas, Tolkeen, & The Federation Of Magic. Come together here to discuss all things Rifts®.

Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones

gelidus
Explorer
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:36 pm

mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by gelidus »

I know there is one or two classes that can charge a e-clip with ppe and then have it count as magic against vampires. Is the mystic knight one of them or did I get confused on this point?
cornholioprime wrote: You are absolutely right, Gelidus.....but I'll never admit it. :D
User avatar
The Beast
Demon Lord Extraordinaire
Posts: 5959
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 3:28 pm
Comment: You probably think this comment is about you, don't you?
Location: Apocrypha

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by The Beast »

That's the first I've heard of that being counted as a magic attack.
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15607
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

gelidus wrote:I know there is one or two classes that can charge a e-clip with ppe and then have it count as magic against vampires. Is the mystic knight one of them or did I get confused on this point?


The mystic knight cannot, no. they can charge PPE clips but it just counts as normal energy.

I'm not sure what other class you had in mind.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
User avatar
Jedrious
Adventurer
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:23 pm
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Jedrious »

Probably confusing Sea Inquisitors and Mystic Knights
Shark_Force
Palladin
Posts: 7128
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:11 pm

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Shark_Force »

yeah, i don't think there's anyone who can charge an e-clip and make it count as magic.
User avatar
Zamion138
Hero
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:34 pm
Location: Carson City NV

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Zamion138 »

Shark_Force wrote:yeah, i don't think there's anyone who can charge an e-clip and make it count as magic.

Maybe, if you put an eye of elroy on a laser gun it get infinte ammo, i might allow that as a form of magical attack. Its also a million credits to do so. For a million credits and a gun that attracts cs dog boys like a ham steak id allow it.
User avatar
flatline
Knight
Posts: 6153
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by flatline »

Magically provided energy does not make the result of consuming that energy magical.

I have no idea if that statement is supported by canon, but that's certainly how I treat it.

--flatline
I don't care about canon answers. I'm interested in good, well-reasoned answers and, perhaps, a short discussion of how that answer is supported or contradicted by canon.

If I don't provide a book and page number, then don't assume that I'm describing canon. I'll tell you if I'm describing canon.
gelidus
Explorer
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:36 pm

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by gelidus »

Zamion138 wrote:
Shark_Force wrote:yeah, i don't think there's anyone who can charge an e-clip and make it count as magic.

Maybe, if you put an eye of elroy on a laser gun it get infinte ammo, i might allow that as a form of magical attack. Its also a million credits to do so. For a million credits and a gun that attracts cs dog boys like a ham steak id allow it.


Malvoren (sp) can do exactly that
cornholioprime wrote: You are absolutely right, Gelidus.....but I'll never admit it. :D
User avatar
say652
Palladin
Posts: 6609
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:32 am
Comment: Avid Cyborg and Braka Braka enthusiast.
Location: 'Murica

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by say652 »

in a modern campaign the sea inquisitor took a nine iron to a local vampire gang. the quickly learned to aviod the docks lol.
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15607
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
User avatar
Nightmask
Palladin
Posts: 9268
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:39 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nightmask »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Given (unless they've changed the text) the book says that the conversion process only changes the power source and everything else is unchanged the gun shouldn't be hurting creatures that require magic to affect because the battery being magic isn't making the attacks magic.
Fair warning: I consider being called a munchkin a highly offensive slur and do report people when they err in doing so.

'Reality is very disappointing.' - Jonathan Switcher from Mannequin

It's 'canon', not 'cannon'. A cannon is a big gun like on pirate ships, canon is what you mean when referring to something as being contained within one of the books such as how many dice to roll for a stat.
User avatar
flatline
Knight
Posts: 6153
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by flatline »

Nightmask wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Given (unless they've changed the text) the book says that the conversion process only changes the power source and everything else is unchanged the gun shouldn't be hurting creatures that require magic to affect because the battery being magic isn't making the attacks magic.


I don't remember seeing mention of converting power sources in RUE. It was prominent in RMB, so I find that to be a curious omission. We didn't like how converting the power source potentially changed the weapon damage or range, so we ignored that rule and left the weapon characteristics (damage, range, payload, etc) unchanged.

--flatline
I don't care about canon answers. I'm interested in good, well-reasoned answers and, perhaps, a short discussion of how that answer is supported or contradicted by canon.

If I don't provide a book and page number, then don't assume that I'm describing canon. I'll tell you if I'm describing canon.
User avatar
Nightmask
Palladin
Posts: 9268
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:39 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nightmask »

flatline wrote:
Nightmask wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Given (unless they've changed the text) the book says that the conversion process only changes the power source and everything else is unchanged the gun shouldn't be hurting creatures that require magic to affect because the battery being magic isn't making the attacks magic.


I don't remember seeing mention of converting power sources in RUE. It was prominent in RMB, so I find that to be a curious omission. We didn't like how converting the power source potentially changed the weapon damage or range, so we ignored that rule and left the weapon characteristics (damage, range, payload, etc) unchanged.

--flatline


That was how the Gizmoteer class handled it as well, not that it wasn't an obvious contradiction in the Rifts book when originally published to state how 'only the power source is changed' for the Techno-Wizard and yet the actual conversion details generic'd all the weapons so that they all had an identical set of abilities no matter what was actually converted.
Fair warning: I consider being called a munchkin a highly offensive slur and do report people when they err in doing so.

'Reality is very disappointing.' - Jonathan Switcher from Mannequin

It's 'canon', not 'cannon'. A cannon is a big gun like on pirate ships, canon is what you mean when referring to something as being contained within one of the books such as how many dice to roll for a stat.
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15607
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

Nightmask wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Given (unless they've changed the text) the book says that the conversion process only changes the power source and everything else is unchanged the gun shouldn't be hurting creatures that require magic to affect because the battery being magic isn't making the attacks magic.


I know, that's why I said "I may let", I.E. houserule. I wasn't saying that was the actual rule.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
gelidus
Explorer
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:36 pm

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by gelidus »

Although it does make me wonder we have two races that can use normal wepaons against vamps what else is there?
cornholioprime wrote: You are absolutely right, Gelidus.....but I'll never admit it. :D
User avatar
flatline
Knight
Posts: 6153
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by flatline »

I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline
I don't care about canon answers. I'm interested in good, well-reasoned answers and, perhaps, a short discussion of how that answer is supported or contradicted by canon.

If I don't provide a book and page number, then don't assume that I'm describing canon. I'll tell you if I'm describing canon.
User avatar
Dr Megaverse
Adventurer
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:17 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Dr Megaverse »

Almost seems like they needed the super water weakness to justify only having vamps in Mexico lol.
User avatar
Talavar
Hero
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:07 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Talavar »

flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?
- If I never hear real world military buffs complaining about Rifts weapons technology again it'll be too soon
- Rifts isn't Warhammer 40K. Try to remember that.
- In vino veritas, and I am hammered!
gelidus
Explorer
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:36 pm

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by gelidus »

Talavar wrote:
flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?



Very true
cornholioprime wrote: You are absolutely right, Gelidus.....but I'll never admit it. :D
User avatar
Jedrious
Adventurer
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:23 pm
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Jedrious »

Talavar wrote:
flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?

Actually, the ones in the "Noble Dead" series by Barb and JC Hendee are done rather well.
User avatar
Talavar
Hero
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:07 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Talavar »

Jedrious wrote:
Talavar wrote:
flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?

Actually, the ones in the "Noble Dead" series by Barb and JC Hendee are done rather well.


Vampires as a legendary monster are pretty much defined by their stupid weaknesses - whether it's running water, "special" water, wooden camping equipment, lower case t's, spilled seeds, magic dirt, the colour yellow (that last one might have been Green Lantern), Palladium is hardly alone in having vampires having to worry about some ridiculous stuff.
- If I never hear real world military buffs complaining about Rifts weapons technology again it'll be too soon
- Rifts isn't Warhammer 40K. Try to remember that.
- In vino veritas, and I am hammered!
User avatar
Blue_Lion
Knight
Posts: 6238
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Clone Lab 27

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Blue_Lion »

Talavar wrote:
Jedrious wrote:
Talavar wrote:
flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?

Actually, the ones in the "Noble Dead" series by Barb and JC Hendee are done rather well.


Vampires as a legendary monster are pretty much defined by their stupid weaknesses - whether it's running water, "special" water, wooden camping equipment, lower case t's, spilled seeds, magic dirt, the colour yellow (that last one might have been Green Lantern), Palladium is hardly alone in having vampires having to worry about some ridiculous stuff.

Yea they just ran with te tradtional vampire weakness instead of tring to use the modern romatisized vampires.
The Clones are coming you shall all be replaced, but who is to say you have not been replaced already.

Master of Type-O and the obvios.

Soon my army oc clones and winged-monkies will rule the world but first, must .......

I may debate canon and RAW, but the games I run are highly house ruled. So I am not debating for how I play but about how the system works as written.
User avatar
cornholioprime
Palladin
Posts: 7686
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 1:05 am
Comment: At long last....I am FINALLY free of my wonderful addiction to the online Flash game "Bloons."
Well, mostly.....
Location: In the Hivelands with General Jericho Holmes, taking advantage of suddenly stupid Xiticix...

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by cornholioprime »

Talavar wrote:
flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?
Anne Rice's.

Once they get old enough even sunlight can't kill them. And the rest of the classic vampire weaknesses simply don't apply to them.
The Kevinomicon, Book of Siembieda 3:16.

16 Blessed art Thou above all others, O COALITION STATES, beloved of Kevin;

17 For Thou art allowed to do Evil without Limit, nor do thy Enemies retaliate.

18 Thy Military be run by Fools and Dotards.

19 Yet thy Nation suffers not. Praise be unto Him that protects thee from all harm!!
User avatar
Talavar
Hero
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:07 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Talavar »

cornholioprime wrote:
Talavar wrote:
flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?
Anne Rice's.

Once they get old enough even sunlight can't kill them. And the rest of the classic vampire weaknesses simply don't apply to them.


I don't know, being crushed by your own ennui and self-absorption could still be considered a stupid weakness....
- If I never hear real world military buffs complaining about Rifts weapons technology again it'll be too soon
- Rifts isn't Warhammer 40K. Try to remember that.
- In vino veritas, and I am hammered!
User avatar
kaid
Knight
Posts: 4089
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:23 pm

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by kaid »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


I would say yes because at that point you are shooting magic not lasers or whatever. Still if you are going to TW a weapon up make a good TW super soaker if you are fighting vamps.
User avatar
SittingBull
Hero
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 am
Comment: "Its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way."
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by SittingBull »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Especially since it would be shooting sun light.
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."
Kosh from Babylon 5
"You don't understand, so you find excuses."
Doctor Who
"Peace has made you weak. Victory has defeated you."
Bane
User avatar
SittingBull
Hero
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 am
Comment: "Its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way."
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by SittingBull »

flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


Working on that.
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."
Kosh from Babylon 5
"You don't understand, so you find excuses."
Doctor Who
"Peace has made you weak. Victory has defeated you."
Bane
User avatar
SittingBull
Hero
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 am
Comment: "Its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way."
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by SittingBull »

I just want to know where Palladium got water as bothering Vampires.
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."
Kosh from Babylon 5
"You don't understand, so you find excuses."
Doctor Who
"Peace has made you weak. Victory has defeated you."
Bane
User avatar
Nightmask
Palladin
Posts: 9268
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:39 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nightmask »

SittingBull wrote:I just want to know where Palladium got water as bothering Vampires.


Vampires can't cross running water in most RL lore so they inflated that to the idea that running water even from a water pistol is harmful to them.
Fair warning: I consider being called a munchkin a highly offensive slur and do report people when they err in doing so.

'Reality is very disappointing.' - Jonathan Switcher from Mannequin

It's 'canon', not 'cannon'. A cannon is a big gun like on pirate ships, canon is what you mean when referring to something as being contained within one of the books such as how many dice to roll for a stat.
User avatar
Zamion138
Hero
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:34 pm
Location: Carson City NV

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Zamion138 »

Nightmask wrote:
SittingBull wrote:I just want to know where Palladium got water as bothering Vampires.


Vampires can't cross running water in most RL lore so they inflated that to the idea that running water even from a water pistol is harmful to them.

Also in "lost boys" water hurts vampires...though they did put garlic in said water.......i base my life on the arch types presented to us in lost boys hehehehe
User avatar
Nightmask
Palladin
Posts: 9268
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:39 am

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nightmask »

Zamion138 wrote:
Nightmask wrote:
SittingBull wrote:I just want to know where Palladium got water as bothering Vampires.


Vampires can't cross running water in most RL lore so they inflated that to the idea that running water even from a water pistol is harmful to them.


Also in "lost boys" water hurts vampires...though they did put garlic in said water.......i base my life on the arch types presented to us in lost boys hehehehe


Check out Monster Squad, Fat Kid drives off Dracula with a garlic-heavy slice of pizza. In the novel One Foot In The Grave (where WM. Mark Simmons shows a scary amount of research into all kinds of vampire lore around the world and details a fair amount of it) garlic oil is used to incapacitate the protagonist as he's a semi-vampire (he's somehow stuck partway through the transformation, still having some human features but also subject to some vampire vulnerabilities).
Fair warning: I consider being called a munchkin a highly offensive slur and do report people when they err in doing so.

'Reality is very disappointing.' - Jonathan Switcher from Mannequin

It's 'canon', not 'cannon'. A cannon is a big gun like on pirate ships, canon is what you mean when referring to something as being contained within one of the books such as how many dice to roll for a stat.
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15607
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

SittingBull wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Especially since it would be shooting sun light.


Actually, TW's are specifically barred from doing that with globe of daylight. mostly because globe of daylight can't hurt vampires period.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
User avatar
wyrmraker
Hero
Posts: 1547
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by wyrmraker »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:
SittingBull wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Especially since it would be shooting sun light.


Actually, TW's are specifically barred from doing that with globe of daylight. mostly because globe of daylight can't hurt vampires period.

Which I have always found to be ridiculous. It's still sunlight, only with the TW enhancements it is amplified to do real damage.
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15607
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

except the point is globe of daylight isn't real sunlight so amplifying it can't make it so.

Or you could just get an air warlock to cast globe of true daylight, which would work
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
User avatar
SittingBull
Hero
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 am
Comment: "Its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way."
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by SittingBull »

Nightmask wrote:
SittingBull wrote:I just want to know where Palladium got water as bothering Vampires.


Vampires can't cross running water in most RL lore so they inflated that to the idea that running water even from a water pistol is harmful to them.


Wow I have gamed for almost 30 years and never heard that. :shock:
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."
Kosh from Babylon 5
"You don't understand, so you find excuses."
Doctor Who
"Peace has made you weak. Victory has defeated you."
Bane
User avatar
SittingBull
Hero
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 am
Comment: "Its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way."
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by SittingBull »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:
SittingBull wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Especially since it would be shooting sun light.


Actually, TW's are specifically barred from doing that with globe of daylight. mostly because globe of daylight can't hurt vampires period.



But its real sunlight? Lightblade uses globe of daylight. :-(
Last edited by SittingBull on Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."
Kosh from Babylon 5
"You don't understand, so you find excuses."
Doctor Who
"Peace has made you weak. Victory has defeated you."
Bane
User avatar
SittingBull
Hero
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 am
Comment: "Its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way."
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by SittingBull »

Zamion138 wrote:
Nightmask wrote:
SittingBull wrote:I just want to know where Palladium got water as bothering Vampires.


Vampires can't cross running water in most RL lore so they inflated that to the idea that running water even from a water pistol is harmful to them.

Also in "lost boys" water hurts vampires...though they did put garlic in said water.......i base my life on the arch types presented to us in lost boys hehehehe


Not normal water though, they lived on coast in their cave. >.>
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."
Kosh from Babylon 5
"You don't understand, so you find excuses."
Doctor Who
"Peace has made you weak. Victory has defeated you."
Bane
User avatar
Slight001
Hero
Posts: 856
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Slight001 »

Wrong thread...
Last edited by Slight001 on Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If your plan relies upon chance to succeed, then you've already failed."
"Sometimes to achieve the greatest good, one must commit great evil."
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15607
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

SittingBull wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:
SittingBull wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Especially since it would be shooting sun light.


Actually, TW's are specifically barred from doing that with globe of daylight. mostly because globe of daylight can't hurt vampires period.



But its real sunlight? Lightblade uses globe of daylight. :-(


Lightblade is actually a spell in and of itself. Lightblade the TW item has globe of daylight in the chain of power source, but has nothing to do with the actual effect.

and either way, lightblade TW item can't destroy vamps permanently, it can just damage them as per the magical lightblade spell.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
User avatar
SittingBull
Hero
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 am
Comment: "Its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way."
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by SittingBull »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:
SittingBull wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:
SittingBull wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Now, it is possible to have a techno-wizard convert a gun to run on PPE INSTEAD OF e-clips, and that I might allow to hurt vampires, ect.


Especially since it would be shooting sun light.


Actually, TW's are specifically barred from doing that with globe of daylight. mostly because globe of daylight can't hurt vampires period.



But its real sunlight? Lightblade uses globe of daylight. :-(


Lightblade is actually a spell in and of itself. Lightblade the TW item has globe of daylight in the chain of power source, but has nothing to do with the actual effect.

and either way, lightblade TW item can't destroy vamps permanently, it can just damage them as per the magical lightblade spell.


I stand corrected. Why does the item even have globe of daylight then as a spell needed?
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."
Kosh from Babylon 5
"You don't understand, so you find excuses."
Doctor Who
"Peace has made you weak. Victory has defeated you."
Bane
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15607
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

Because in the origional Rifts TW rules, it was stated that all TW devices need a power source spell in the chain that drives the device, in addition to the actual effects. in fact, the entire starting TW list of spells was SOLELY power source spells, and they had to go out and learn any actual effect spells they wanted to use.

This requirement was done away with in RUE entirely, and their starting spell list has many more options, however, the TW items that were already made did not have their spell chains altered to remove "power source" spells that have no purpose in the device. that's why you'll notice that every TW item that was copied and pasted from first edition contains such a spell, even if it makes no obvious sense. for instance, magic optic system requires energy bolt dispite not doing damage, communications band has globe of daylight dispite emitting no light, ect. the Lightblade weapon was from a very eairly rifter and made using the "all TW devices must use one of the TW's starting spells as a power source" rule.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
User avatar
cornholioprime
Palladin
Posts: 7686
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 1:05 am
Comment: At long last....I am FINALLY free of my wonderful addiction to the online Flash game "Bloons."
Well, mostly.....
Location: In the Hivelands with General Jericho Holmes, taking advantage of suddenly stupid Xiticix...

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by cornholioprime »

Talavar wrote:
cornholioprime wrote:
Talavar wrote:
flatline wrote:I never liked Palladium's take on vampires. I don't mind the regeneration, but I hate the near invulnerability coupled with stupid weaknesses.

--flatline


What kind of vampires don't have stupid weaknesses?
Anne Rice's.

Once they get old enough even sunlight can't kill them. And the rest of the classic vampire weaknesses simply don't apply to them.


I don't know, being crushed by your own ennui and self-absorption could still be considered a stupid weakness....
The point in her novels, about that particular aspect of being immortal, was to keep on loving and living for others.

I always get the names of The Twins mixed up (Mekare and Maharet, one of them utterly mindless) and forget which one is which, but the one that took care of her extended family and kept watch over them, over the millennia, was arguably the most sane vampire of them all.
The Kevinomicon, Book of Siembieda 3:16.

16 Blessed art Thou above all others, O COALITION STATES, beloved of Kevin;

17 For Thou art allowed to do Evil without Limit, nor do thy Enemies retaliate.

18 Thy Military be run by Fools and Dotards.

19 Yet thy Nation suffers not. Praise be unto Him that protects thee from all harm!!
User avatar
Tor
Palladin
Posts: 6975
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:37 pm
Comment: If you have something to say, back it up with thoughts and reasons. Simply posting to agree or disagree tends to be a waste.
Location: Pyramid

Re: mystic knight vs vampire

Unread post by Tor »

Zamion138 wrote:in "lost boys" water hurts vampires...though they did put garlic in said water.......i base my life on the arch types presented to us in lost boys hehehehe
I believe the water they soaked the garlic in (they had it in a bath tub if I recall) was also holy too, wasn't it? Like blessed by a priest or something?
"1st edition? 2nd edition? It doesnt matter! Let's just talk" -Forums of the Megaverse
Locked

Return to “Rifts®”