Blue_Lion wrote: Johnnycat93 wrote:RedRose wrote:I absolutely love how people will give the CS anything on this site, yet when it comes to caster types.
They think they would not be smart enough, (even tho the book clearly states them as being highly
intelligent) to actually use the powers they have at their disposal.
Apparently they weren't. Welcome to the magical world of flavor text. Remember that this is not a scenario that is theoretically playing out and it is up to the boards to decide what happens. This scenario has already been resolved by Palladium and they, in their infinite wisdom, decided that the mages of Tolkeen did not actually bother to sufficiently check the dimension they where sending nukes into. I thinks thats all anyone is trying to say. You may be right and it may be down right silly that they didn't check, but that doesn't change what the book says happened.
Where does it say they did not test or reserch the only cannon for created new spells in rifts is in another game. Where you come up with an idea for a spell and make it. If that was used then the spell whould have the desired affects.
Tolkeen cast many masivly powerfull spells without the CS knowledge. Including turning the whole city into regenerating MDC structures. Tolkeen had access to other planes, and even shifter varent that traveled them. No military whould trust the defence of a capital city to an untested affect.
A newly developed and untested defense is better than no defense at all. They got lucky.
Blue_Lion wrote:Now what no one for the CS has adressed is
Smart nukes do not blow up on the wrong target
You've yet to prove this. Nor do you have any way what so ever of knowing how traveling into alternate dimensions where the very laws of reality might differ, might effect a nuclear missile.
Blue_Lion wrote:
bombing a whole city even if it has a base does not make it a legal target
You're under the greviously mistaken impression that there are rules of war in Rifts earth. Or that the CS sees Tolkeen as even worthy of them if they were. The CS didn't nuke Free Quebec, but Free Quebec wasn't a nation of aliens and demon lovers (And demons) Nuking a nation that's allied with demons is well with in most people's frame of mind as acceptable. They'd allied with supernatural evil on a massive scale.
Blue_Lion wrote:
How the laws of war whould hold it accountable
What law's of war? Who's going to hold them accountable? Even by the most generous stretch of the imagination, the strongest power on earth, makes it's money by the enslavement of sentient beings and intergalactic conquest. ((Atlantis/The Sploog.)) Going even further, Tolkeen wasn't a 'Human' kingdom to be afforded the rights as such.
Blue_Lion wrote:
With what Tolkeen knew the spell was safe. nothing ever says that tolkeens system killed people you are simlply twisting something to suit your whim.
Noone's twisting anything. We're saying they didn't ____KNOW____ it was safe. They presumed it was safe. And in that it was a presumption, they MAY have inadvertantly killed millions. They may not have. We don't know. Through their actions they did open that possibility.
Blue_Lion wrote:
Both sides comited Grievous war crimes but the defence system was not one of them.
Agreed.
Blue_Lion wrote:
Tolkeens crimes
Torture, killing sacrifice of prisonrs.
Mind control, enslavement.
Pacts with super natural eviel.
Human rights violation
CS crimes.
Genecide
Delberate targeting non military targets.
Tolkeen was a military target. The entire city was the target.
Blue_Lion wrote:
Enslavement (CS mutant animals)
They're not enslaved. Not as stated. They were created and serve in a service class, but are mostly happy to do so, those that aren't run away and unless they make problems for the CS they're mostly let go if they 'escape'. The Lone Star book goes into this in pretty great detail about how most dog boys love their jobs, love the CS and love doing what they do.
They're not given the same level of rights, but they're beloved by the people and even the troops.
Blue_Lion wrote:
Torture, killing of prisnors.
Human rights violations.
Now despite this facts many soldiers on both sides are not all eviel. In fact many people on both sides where standing up for a noble cause the supported. The Defence spells for the city where ment to keep it safe without costing human life and is one of the things that tolkeen did right.
That is what it was 'MEANT TO DO'. But they did not test it (( how could you? it's not like they had nukes to launch at themselves)) To KNOW that it wouldn't hurt anyone. it was a prototype that by all accounts saved the day, but that ignorance on where all those 100 nukes went is a heavy thing hanging up there in the air.
Blue_Lion wrote:
Stoping the nukes on your home soil means risking nucler materal making it into the gound water, sending them some place that every thing points to as not been inhabited makes perfect stratgic sense.
If you're willing to possibly sacrifice others so that you might live? yes. If somone shot a nuke at the US and we could make it hit Canada instead... it's 'good' for us.. .but really bad for Canada and they're not going to be pleased. Nor should they be. We threw it at them.
There in lies the problem with the Tolkeen nuke defense shield. While it's great for them, their ignorance of the dimension in which they shunted the missles leaves open the possibility that their actions cost the lives of millions.
Not ENSURED the loss of millions of lives.
Opened the possibility.
In that they did so and made that tactical decision, is not a good thing. They looked at their defense system and went
"ok... it rifts the missiles out. Where do they go?"
and who ever built it went '.... .We think it's a limbo like alternate dimension'.
"you think?"
"Yeah.. we're pretty sure"
"how sure?"
"Well we don't know.. but we presume"
"ok... we don't KNOW?"
"no.... but we presume it won't hurt anyone"
"But you don't KNOW that it wont?"
"Well... it won't hurt US... it MIGHT hurt someone else, but we don't think so"
And at some point... one of the generals if not Creed himself went "Ok... well if it won't hurt us, that's a risk I'm willing to take"
That willingness to perhaps hurt others, inadvertently through your own defense, is the object of the dissention here. If it's a thrown punch and you duck out of the way and shove your attacker and he hits a bystander.. That sucks.
If it's a flight of 100 nuclear missles, and you throw them some where with out looking, based on a presumption............ that... is callous and pretty henious. Is it able to be comprehended? "We block a nuke strike and hope it doesn't hit someone else" Yeah we can UNDERSTAND it.. .b ut it doesnt' change what the act is.