Giant2005 wrote:Shark_Force wrote:there's the fact that her response to its publication was to not endorse it because she felt it was incomplete, rather than denouncing it as lies and defamation. there's the fact that it was published by people who are colleagues, acquaintances, and personal friends, who plainly don't have the goal of ruining her scholastic reputation because the book is in high demand and is widely considered to be the best source of information about the world available. there's the fact that kevin tells us that this excerpt *is* the report which erin tarn submitted. there's the fact that it's a compilation of stuff written by her, not a revision of stuff written by her.
Kevin never says that Tarn submitted anything. He specifically states that she won't even endorse the writing.
Erin wrote the letters.
Lazlo commissioned the Book that compiled the letters (considering that the paragraph explains Tarn "refused to write the volume herself, we can be 100% sure that they commissioned someone else to do it).
Lazlo published the tome.
Kevin took an excerpt from the fictional tome to present to us.
That is the order of operations and as you can see, beyond writing the letters, Tarn had nothing at all to do with it - she actively refused to be a participant.
Stop saying otherwise - blatant misinformation only serves to weaken your argument.
kevin *does* say she submitted something. that something was later included into the book. she wasn't happy about the book being published, but it is extremely clear that she *did* publish that earlier report. and since the only part of the book we see is that earlier report which was included in the book, the parts about why she didn't endorse the full book are not relevant to the excerpt which we have, which *is* something she professionally authored and published.