tenakafurey wrote:As it is, we know they adapt their tactics….WB23 tells us this…so it is the case that swarming is not the one and only tactic they use
You are still combining responses and tactics.
The Xiticix do adopt the best battle tactics of any given combat situation.
They do not modify their racially programmed responses to general situations, and nothing in WB23:XI says otherwise. SoT 5
does imply otherwise, I fully admit. I also admit that I despise unnecessary retcons (and yes, that is "what I personally believe to be unnecessary").
Swarming an enemy is a tactic, it's true.
Attacking an enemy in the "20 and over" case is not a tactic, is a racially programmed response with a single objective, to destroy the enemy. Any number of tactics might be used, although the typical one is the 2/4-8 swarm tactic. Destroying the enemy, however, is the only option they have.
If the Xiticix can really do anything they want in response to any situation, then they wouldn't be instinct-based insect-like creatures. They'd be humans in bug suits. One of things that makes the Xiticix what they are is their instinctive nature and their automatic responses to certain situations. Yes, it does make them somewhat predictable. Not entirely, though, as they may use any battle tactic they chose in order to resolve a combat that their instinct compels them to engage in, such as the appearance of a group of enemies in the Hiveland in the "20 and over" case.
tenakafurey wrote:…irrespective of what page 10 says or implies. That it deals with only small groups does not imply they are the only cases to be considered.
The cases on WB23 p.10-11 do not imply that any other case need be considered.
You are inventing other cases for the sole reason that other cases aren't listed. (So is SoT 5. I have specifically stated that this is "as far as I am concerned", so please, no comebacks about me attempting to assert that SoT 5 isn't actual canon.)
The list does not even appear to need extra cases. It fits perfectly with the Xiticix' aggressive xenophobia. This xenophobia is hardwired into their beings. They just can't look at hundreds of thousands of enemies inside their Hiveland and hold back from attacking (WB23:XI p.17 col.1-2). When just one Xiticix becomes agitated, then the others do, as well. When they are in an agitated states, "[...] attacking any outsider/invader/intruder
they happen to notice." This means includes those who aren't doing anything but moving slowly in a big line.
400k MD/MDC troopers proceeding through the Hiveland is going to cause that agitation. Why? Because they possess firepower than can hurt the hive and any Xiticix flying through the area.
We know the Xiticix were threatened because the Xiticix did attack and the CS lost 25% of its force.
We have already gone over numerous cases of just how likely it would be for a significant number of CS troopers to open up with weapons and explosives and their vehicular weaponry in response to the Xiticix's, so the canon reality that Holmes' force did this just flies in the face of what I am willing to believe.
Again, the Xiticix were threatened (see above and many past posts), and because of this they would not leave off the situation. The raiding swarm would ensue as soon as the CS army was out of the Hiveland (fully cited and quoted in prior posts).
tenakafurey wrote:This means Holmes trek isn't impossible…
It depends on what sort of magic pill you are willing to swallow.
GM: "An ordinary mortal human boy with +0 to Strike carrying an ordinary toy water gun loaded with ordinary water shoots you. The impact of the water stream has killed you!"
Player: "I have 50 MDC body armor on, and my dodge is +20!"
GM: "It's my game, what I say goes."
Player: <walks out on the game, with total and full justification />
It's easy to walk out on a bad game, but it is not so easy to walk out on Rifts.
tenakafurey wrote:all you can really argue about is if the Xiticix response should be considered typical or atypical.
There it is again, the combining of responses and tactics.
They aren't the same thing as far as the Xiticix are concerned.
tenakafurey wrote:And as SoT is the only book that specifically deals with the Xiticix response to 400,000 troops, there is nothing to say it's atypical.
Other than the fact that it utterly contradicts the information, the information I have
fully cited and quoted (which you have failed to address), that is found in WB23:XI? (I won't re-cite all of it again. This all makes it appear to me that you have chosen to ignore sections of the WB23:XI. That is fine, I ignore sections of many Rifts books myself. It would be helpful if you let me know specifically what you have chosen to ignore so that I can better understand where your viewpoint originates or if you labeled it "in my Rifts universe" or if you believe that SoT 5 fully supersedes WB23:XI and that the information found there was wrong.)
tenakafurey wrote:RainOfSteel wrote:In the specific case of Hiveland invasion (i.e. Holmes' force), raiding swarms will be dispatched after the attack to exact revenge and retaliation with a destructive rage in the hearts (so to speak) of the Xiticix.
Retaliation and revenge for what?
I listed it in many previous posts. I quoted WB23:XI twice in extensive detail.
I will go over it again.
The CS army was
in the Hiveland and it was
a force of 400 MD/MDC equipped soldiers that
represented a clear and present danger and was an unacceptable threat to the Hive and as is clearly spelled out on WB23:XI p.12 and p.17 the Xiticix would attack.
That's it. Those are the main reasons. There were others, too. I went over them, but it appears you did not address them or any of the primary reasons other than to say "Retaliation and revenge for what?"?
tenakafurey wrote:RainOfSteel wrote:I still say that the "20 and over" is a response case, and not a tactic.
Which is essentially conceding that your argument is based on your interpretation of how the Xiticix should act.
It is what is written in the book.
That is the point of all this discussion. Essentially it's a statement of dissatisfaction over the differences implied between WB23:XI and SoT 5.
I never tried to assert that SoT 5 and the Holmes Maneuver weren't canon.
I have asserted that it completely snaps the suspenders of disbelief back in my face like a powerful rubber-band slingshot launch gone bad, and I have been stating the reasons for why this occurs to me.
tenakafurey wrote:SoT shows them acting another way, a way that's not impossible, a way that isn't contradicted by WB23 but which does fall into the category of "other tactics" mentioned in that book.
You are correct. The SoT 5 behavior that the Xiticix are noted as displaying is not "impossible". KS is the author of the milieu and what he says goes and what I say is only my own opinion on the subject. The retcon is as official as it is going to get, being that it is in print.
tenakafurey wrote:The point is, if their primary response is indeed to swarm,
They have a variety of responses, including ignoring even those they consider their enemies, if they are present in sufficiently small numbers and don't engage in other offensive behavior (offensive to the Xiticix).
But swarming is a battle tactic applied when a given response and objective have been determined.
When a response of, "Oh, that group too small to bother with," is generated within the Xiticix mind, they most certainly do not swarm. They engage in no tactics at all and go about their business . . . unless the group alters its behavior.
tenakafurey wrote:and they follow no other tactics unless outnumbered
WB23:XI p.17 says, "They (instinctively) seem to select the best strategy or tactic for a given situation and act swiftly." This is clearly in regards to the list above, "[...] tactics such as coordinated attacks, feints, ambushes, pincer tactics, and large troop operations."
I would like to point out that this is also
directly below the part about "[...] attacking any outsider/invader/intruder
they happen to notice."
I assure you, since they were attacking Holmes' force, they had noticed them, and were following this directive.
Since WB23:XI p.11 states that they attack any group of "20 or more", and we also know that they did attack the CS army, because the CS army lost 25% of their force, the question then really becomes why would the Xiticix attack (which they did do), but not destroy the enemy (as WB23:XI p.11 states they will do)? Especially when
it would have been exceeding easy for the Xiticix to have utterly annihilated the CS army with very little in the way of losses for them?
IMO, there is no reconciling this. It is the essential definition of irreconcilable differences.
SoT 5 can state whatever it wants about what happened, but that doesn't change the blistering rubber band mark left behind across my face. (And it is but one such mark left by SoT as a whole. Heh, is anyone up for a new round of the SB1 Skelebot capability description vs. what actually happened in SoT?)
tenakafurey wrote:then why would they not swarm Holmes since every source seems to say they would outnumber him?
You have hit the nail upon the head. A Xiticix swarm should have descended upon one end of the column and ripped it to shreds and then rolled up the whole column.
Why didn't it happen that way? It wasn't written that way. "It wasn't part of the script."
tenakafurey wrote:Which means either the Xiticix numbers have been grossly exaggerated – in which case the Xiticix tactics could be a result of the need to conserve troops – or they haven't, in which case Holmes should have been swarmed under if your "Swarm at all costs" theory is appropriate.
It appears to me that your argument is, "Because the story had a screwy element in it (the fact that the Xiticix didn't full-on swarm Holmes' forces), that the Xiticix numbers have been grossly exaggerated."
I approach it from another direction, "The story had a screwy element in it." (Well, it had several such screwy elements in it.)
tenakafurey wrote:As it is, we know what the Xiticix response actually was. The question is, why is it impossible for them to act that way?
No. As I have stated, their response as written in SoT 5 is not impossible, just not in keeping with WB23:XI's
overall picture of the Xiticix.
And just not believable to me personally.
tenakafurey wrote:RainOfSteel wrote:KC wasn't talking about the tactics. He was talking about case-by-case responses to known situations.
And walking into a Hiveland with 400,000 men and not attacking, challenging or provoking them was an entirely unknown situation . . .
The CS army was
in the Hiveland and it was
a force of 400 MD/MDC equipped soldiers that
represented a clear and present danger and was an unacceptable threat to the Hive and as is clearly spelled out on WB23:XI p.12 and p.17 the Xiticix would attack.
It appears to be a fully described and covered situation so far as I can determine.
tenakafurey wrote:so why is it so surprising that the Xiticix response was different as well?
It is because the Xiticix were challenged and provoked.
I am not sure why you believe that 400K MD/MDC soldiers weren't a challenging provocation from their
mere presence within the Hiveland and why the Xiticix would not become agitated as it is stated will happen automatically and why they don't engage in "[...] attacking any outsider/invader/intruder
they happen to notice." Of which Holmes' force definitely qualified in every respect.
I am, of course, aware of SoT 5's explanation. IMO, the explanation is a description of acts that would only anger the Xiticix more than they already were (angry enough to attack and kill 25% of the force, but strangely no more . . . what?). It simply doesn't hold water AFAIC.
tenakafurey wrote:RainOfSteel wrote:You haven't explained why an army of 400k MD/MDC equipped troops with massive firepower wouldn't be considered a threat.
Because they didn't attack. Because they weren't moving to attack the Hive. Because they didn't stop to claim territory. Because they were moving away.
And I have provided my references and explanations for why I believe that those activities would not matter to the Xiticix in any way other than to make them more angry (per the available descriptions in WB23:XI).