Zylo wrote:That also doesn't mean there was anything left. We're both guessing here since the writing lacked details.
Going by SoT5, where we're told at least some of the men are working farms, etc it would seem there is something left. It may not be much, it may only be for show...but it remains a real possibility.
I'm sorry, but hunting for 300K people just wouldn't work. I live in a town that is around 200K, with everyone within 20 miles, it's probably 300K or a little more. Do I think this entire population could move into the woods and mountains and hunt to survive? Even with rationing food and water, I don't see it possible for anything but a very, very short time period. Did herds of buffalo survive the Rifts, move to the area between the Xiticix and Tolkeen, and wait to get slaughtered?
We don't know. But the area isn't like modern day USA. There is a lot of wilderness. The possibility of herds of animals isn't that far fetched. Its not like anyone abandoning the area would be likely to bring livestock with him either.
Would hunting suffice? Not on its own...at least, not without a large catchment area. But it would help.
Sounds like you're talking about Holmes at first. Why bother gathering as much supplies as possible when evacuating? Why take rations for weeks when you'll probably need months? Because you take what you can, when you can, and as much as you can.
If you're evacuating, you'll take what can't be replaced. Your possessions. If you're running, you'll leave with your most valuable gear...your possessions. Moving the food would mena the evacuatuon was planned and carried out meticulously.
Far from impossible. But it really could cut either way. They may or may not have stripped the food. Canon states Holmes found standing buildings, livestock and farms in good enough condition that he had men working the fields soon after.
Thus, we can conclude that at least some food was probably left. But a Barony able to support 150,000 people shows that the area wasn't as barren as presumed. It offers the CS shelter, water and the amenities of home. If we can account for food, they're set.
I agree it is wide open as to what really happened, plus I need to reread some of the books. Was North Tolkeen ever really attacked by the CS? I thought they were bogged down in Elemental Alley and other silly places?
Apparently they were, but the extent isn't made clear. Tolkeen then evacuated the area. And while Markeen was hit hard, there's little say the CS couldn't find something of use.
They threw a quarter-million bugs into the air, not to mention there is no mention of ground pounder numbers for the bugs, and they weren't worried? I think they were worried. They might have changed their mindset later, which is what the author wants us to believe, but the situation and how it happened is ludicrous; no CS soliders returning fire, sporadic attacks by the Xiticix amidst a swarm, etc.
Hit and run attacks are stated by WB23 to be a Xiticix tactic. WB20 states the Xiticix aren't too worried about nomadic groups, tribes, clans, etc as they aren't seen as encroaching upon their territory. WB23 shows examples where small groups are allowed to live, even if they fight.
Out of all this, the most unbelievable is expecting that the CS would universally hold fire. They probably didn't.
IMO, you are ignoring the black and white statements on previous behavior, and trying to extrapolate behavior based on opinion.
Yes...it's black and white. Trouble is....taking it as a literal truth is probably wrong. Why? Because if WB20 is correct and tribes, clans and nomadic groups aren't destroyed, or universally attacked or are only driven away, then the statement that the Xiticix fight to destroy groups of 20 or over is plainly not the entire truth.
Even then all WB23 says it that large groups *typically* elicit a response. It's thus acknowledgeing that exceptions are known to happen.
In other words, even WB23 is grey on the issue of the response the Xiticix should take wrt Holmes.
If there were behaviors versus superior numbers other than what was listed why didn't the author detail them?
He did. Feints, ambushes, wave attacks, hit and run, large troop operations, etc.
The trouble is none of this is mentioned on p10 which describes a typical Xiticix response...swarm them under. And yet, if this is the typical response to groups of 20 or more...when do these "advanced" tactics get used?
Lazlo, and even Atlantis moving against the Xiticix if needed.
Lazlo began moving against the Xiticix circa 105 PA.
As for tactics, the bugs with instinctively use tactics when needed. If you do a frontal assault and it works why would they change? Why pull back and do a flanking maneuver when you have the enemy routed and on the run? Keep attacking, it's working!
Why use any other tactic at all? Because frontal attacks are not always the best. And ambushes are particularly difficult to pull off after a frontal assault.
In short, swarming may be a preferred response...it cannot be the only one, no matter what page 10 of WB23 states.
If you survive the trip. A response of 250K bugs, which is a swarm I believe, would have the Hive so agitated, they would be attacking everything in site, including large armored troops and vehicles in their territory. Yes, they might stop once the CS left the Hivelands, but there is no reason for the sporadic attacks up till then.
And yet canon also states they are often satisified with driving groups away, even while they are in the Hivelands. Canon states they often leave nomadic groups, tribes, clans, etc alone or relatively unmolested.
Sounds like what happened to Holmes, doesn't it?
Not armies, but settlements right? Ones that have been annexed into the Hivelands by expansion and will be harrassed until they leave or destroyed eventually. Not the same thing.
Annexed settlements, loners, tribes, nomads, clans....all have been allowed to live regardless of size. Holmes trek is unusual because of its size..but it doesn't appear to be unique.
Competing and invading are not the same thing.
Holmes wasn't invading though...was he?
Invading army != Nomads, IMHO. I think you're giving these examples far too much weight.
But Holmes wasn't invading. He wasn't attacking, he wasn't challenging, he wasn't making for the hive, he wasn't staking any claim to territory. He was doing non e of the things an invader would be expected to do.
Just like any other nomadic groups, he was passing through.
Trespassing is punishable by death in Xiticix lands.
And as is shown in several books, this isn't always true. In fact, the deciding factor in those books seems to be if the Xiticix decides that you are (as WB20 puts it) encroaching on their territory...i.e staking a claim and challenging their right to it.
That is apparently why nomadic groups, tribes, clans etc get away with "trespassing".
They did attack, that's official, so why stop when you're routing the enemy? Did they feel bad for the CS? I didn't think they had emotions like that...
They weren't routing the enemy. And if the "generals" of the Xiticix are as as smart as the books stae, they had to realise Holmes was effectively letting them win. As it was, should he fight back, the Xiticix would take heavy losses.
And take it for no gain.
Isn't it also true that the Xiticix of rival Hives will work together against a common enemy? As far as the bugs know Holmes could have been moving through their lands to get to another Hive. They could have destroyed him just for that reason, which is just as believable as the reasons the attacks were sporadic, IMO.
I'm not sure. Some indications suggest yes, others no.
EJL