How about some novels?

[psiandco]

Oh I already think for myself thanks.
One of the reasons why I don't consider a lesbian relationship to be a deviant fetish But you do you boo.

Do you?
Do you think for yourself? Are you sure?
Because all I have witnessed from you is preprogrammed idiosyncrasies, hypocrisy, and being blind to reality.
I feel pity, for you.
Reality always wins.
Your delusions will only cause you pain, suffering.
Your life will be a stream of lies and self justification, excuses for you and mockery for all you don't agree with.

You never once ask if you are right, do you?
Go on, play with yourself, and call it "enlightened, beautiful, self-love" or whatever jazzy name makes you feel snug, smug, and secure...
I won't agree.
I don't appreciate it.
I am NOT your judge.
I am not responsible for whatever may come
That shatters your world.

Warning: Warning for violations of Rule 2. Flaming/ Harrassment

[psiandco]

wonder what he will think when he gets to the throuple.

That pointless hedonism is pointless.
It is not love. It is not true, and never will be "honest"
Such things are "lust"...

You can have your "cookie" now, but you will never understand
That if you work for real rewards your joy will not be fake and fleeting.

Reality always wins.
Truth is eternal.

Warning: Warning for violation of Rule 2. Flaming/ Harrassment, “Making a post insulting or degrading someone for having a belief, opinion, or lifestyle that is different than your own is flaming.”

[psiandco]

I'm assuming we're supposed to be coherent.

Lol
Yes. You are.
"Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds"
Are you certain that your programming is coherent?
Truth is consistent, falsehoods will always need more excuses.

"The only people who accept excuses, are those who need them."

Warning: Warning for violations of Rule 2. Flaming/ Harrassment

[psiandco]

I utter a curse, you will never understand but will endlessly suffer from;
you will never have enough...

Warning: Warning for violation of Rule 2. Flaming/ Harrassment, and Rule 1. SPAM

[jaymz]

Anyone with basic reading comprehension would have understood it was to be read were not we're but you've demonstrated you're not capable of putting sensical and coherent thoughts down so....

Using terms like woke, deviant fetishes, and now hedonism in the ways you have tells on you in so many ways that you seem oblivious too....it is you who should be pitied.

Mods please lock this thread to keep it ftom spiraling even further from this point on.

[Josh Hilden]

Que Paso?

[psiandco]

I am very opinionated. Yes I rub people the wrong way but at the end of the day I just enjoy good hard discussion and will gladly walk away agreeing to not agree.

bye.

[Fenris2020]

Sprinkling in sentence fragments, especially in dialogue, can make the work feel less stilled and more grounded in reality. That said, like, with everything else, less is more.

But back to the original question, Palladium needs to do more fiction.

I guess some people talk like that (maybe they grew up ToS Kirk fans), so that's forgivable; but when you have a dozen fragment per page, not in quotes, it tells me that someone needs to pick up the grammar book from the 4th grade and familiarize themselves with the contents.