Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:41 am
by gordyzx9r
Could possibly be due the production dates...RPK manufacture began around 1959, the RPD since the '40s. Depending on where you go if you google it, some sites say the RPD replaced the RPK after the war. IMO...I wouldn't be surprised to have seen them both in either the Soviet or Chinese styles...but who knows, just my opinion.
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:10 pm
by Jefffar
So . . . if you're that concerned, use the RPD instead of the RPK, the only thing it will change game mechanic wise is the load the VC can carry.
That being said . . . I don't think the VC had a standard anything. The NVA might have had a standard weapon, but the VC used whatever they could pick up.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:32 am
by Jefffar
Technically, the M-16 wasn't in the 'Nam as the main weapon until after '65 or '66 so if it's there the RPK can be as well.
I agree the use of the RPG, though I think most VC squads probably wont have it, or a machinegun for that matter. The exception being the main force and disguised NVA units. Putting an RPG and an MG in each VC squad is a good way to cycle through characters quickly.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:14 pm
by Jefffar
I read one memo of an infantry lieutenant in the 'Nam where it seems like his platoon came under fire from captured M-16s more than AK-47s.
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:28 am
by Jefffar
Clever little fellas, weren't they?