Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:38 pm
by taalismn
Looks good...
What really irked me about the Three Galaxys Dimension Book was that the description stats for the 'Explorer' cruiser concentrated more on its values as a weapons platform, and didn't tell what made it uniquely suited for exploration work...
This is good because what we have here in the 'TRadesman' is the equivalent of a corporate exploration ship and heavy mercantile scout better suited to the task of openning up new territories...
I'd also add on drone deployment racks and lander packages for launching a variety of specialized (and expendable) probes, including stealth cultural study landers(good to have some idea of what the natives are like before you say 'howdy' and learn too late that they're rampant xenophobes who bring out the heavy artillery for strangers). Also at least one courier drone/bouy(so your homebase knows what killed you)
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:11 pm
by taalismn
I keep seeing the unfolding little lander from 2010: Odyssey Two, trunki'n off from the Leonov...and Robert L. Forward's variety of specialized probes that his characters launch off in 'Flight of the Dragonfly'...
And don't forget our two little rovers on Mars...still going strong after over a year!
I'm kinda surprised there isn't more material on drone robots for Phaseworld....THough I imagine there are plenty of suppliers who are putting out various kits and packages for everything from ground rover utility 'bots to sophisticated 'Voyager'-style intersystem instrument 'buses', that can even deploy their own landers and atmosphere probes!
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:31 pm
by Braden Campbell
taalismn wrote:the description stats for the 'Explorer' cruiser concentrated more on its values as a weapons platform, and didn't tell what made it uniquely suited for exploration work...
The fact hat it is a
cruiser with as much MDC armour plating as a
battleship.
I can only surmise that it was given so much protection because it was designed to be away from freindly ports and repair centers for years at a time...
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:45 pm
by taalismn
gadrin wrote:actually its from JMS (crusade), as in the episode
Memory of War where a Technomage left behind an AI to run things after he'd died.
I was thinking of a Gene-Tech who eventually died or was able to Transfer his Intelligence and use a holographic system. The idea was that he "created" the felines and was going to pit them against other parts of the region, until the Supernova effectively cut them off from other parts of the galaxy. Their tech was created from a time long ago and hasn't advanced much.
Hmmm, I wonder if
this ship is too big to use with the
Tradesman ? The
Tradesman is about 3x the size..
Remember, what you can't fit into a hangar bay can always be maglocked to an external clamp, or parked in orbit....
Having backup ships when in unfamiliar territory is ALWAYS a good idea(just be sure to have your home coordinates safe-locked in case you encounter something you don't want following you home...)
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:16 pm
by taalismn
My first impression of the Infiltrator was 'long range deep penetration'...so it oughta have its own FTL drive..and be as close to beating competitive Oni designs as the Naruni can make it...
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:17 pm
by taalismn
Phase field would be an after-market modification...I don't see the Naruni offering Promethean-owned tech as showroom-standard tech....
Chameleon holo-flage and EW cloaking up the yazang on the other hand are more Naruni style.
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:22 pm
by taalismn
plus palm-greasing, 'sales facilitation charges', delivery expedient surcharges, and a commission for 'letting you in on this exclusive special deal'.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:12 am
by Aramanthus
I like your variant Gadrin!
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:51 pm
by Aramanthus
I'll have to think about it for a short time. I'll post if I can think of something that someone else hasn't already suggested.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:50 pm
by Aramanthus
Maybe some sort of bay that could contain planetary probes one could launch them from. Of course the a cruise missile sized probe might work too.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:07 pm
by Aramanthus
Unless they made it known they didn't carry any. Of course that might be a little stupid too.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:02 pm
by Aramanthus
That is the reason I was at first talking about a specific bay for deploying such probes.
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:34 pm
by taalismn
"Well, excrement for brains, you just scored a direct hit on that Kreeghor Berserker with our balloon-soft lander....You wanna follow it up by telling me you just armed an anti-matter warhead in our ventral workbay?"
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:43 am
by Aramanthus
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 5:05 pm
by taalismn
Even highly trained CCW Fleet Academy graduates make boneheaded mistakes!
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:56 pm
by Aramanthus
I do have a pocket carrier version of the hunter. But the stats are in my CCW Warship folder at home. I built it on the vessel mentioned in the Rifter story "Hammer of the Forge." If someone reminds me I'll post the differences after work tonight.
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:41 pm
by Aramanthus
I mean remind me about midnight central US standard time. LOL
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:24 pm
by Aramanthus
It's almost 9:30pm here. I have a safety meeting with the rest of 2nd shift at 10:15pm. Then I just have to wait for the third shift person to come in.
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:18 am
by Aramanthus
That sounds about right!
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:41 am
by Aramanthus
I'm counting on it!
JK I should remember. Of course I have to post for my play by post game tonight too.
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:00 am
by Aramanthus
Thank you for the reminder!
My Hunter variation got stretched by 100 feet. This area was for the 6 medium fighters it carried. Each of the fighters is set in there wing tip to wing tip for half of the flight. The other half is set facing the away from each other. That way the full flight can take off in an instant notice. And they can land in there individual bay. And therefore you have to add 10 for the flight crew. And you add 8 pilots for the fighters.
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:33 pm
by taalismn
darkmax wrote:hmm.... that is long.... BTW where is that hunter ship?..... Time to have a look and mod one out.
The Phaseworld Sourcebook...thin little bugger that came after the Phaseworld Dimension Book....notable for its Kevin Long depiction of a Silverhawk on the cover...
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:53 pm
by Aramanthus
I think it's a great little work horse!
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:03 pm
by taalismn
Major magazine inventory project...which meant I immediately got swamped by people asking for this, that, and the other thing...sort of what I'm going through now...
HEY PEOPLE! I'M SAVING THE MEGAVERSE HERE!!!!LEAVE ME ALONE!!!
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:44 pm
by Aramanthus
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:55 am
by Aramanthus
No, I did 180 degree spin with my car. I was only doing about 35 MPH when I lost traction.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:05 am
by Aramanthus
Mine was on fresh snow/ slush.
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:20 pm
by Aramanthus
You are one lucky guy Gadrin! I'm glad you weren't hurt!
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:45 am
by Aramanthus
I wouldn't say crazy. Addicted to driving fast might be the true answer.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:11 pm
by Aramanthus
I know. I have a question what about speeding? Is it like the Autobahn over there? Or are there speed limits?
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:28 pm
by taalismn
darkmax wrote:where? in Singapore? Our limit is like 90 kmph max!
Okay...that's one thing that media has NOT exaggerated about America...insane speeds...which I swear we do just to outdo the Germans....
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 11:09 pm
by Aramanthus
Isn't 90 kilometers about 70mph. I've got to read my speedometer tonight on the way home from work!
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:55 pm
by Aramanthus
220? Wow you are a speedy one! On average I'll drive around 115kmph but that is on the interstate. I think the fastest I've ever gone was behind a friend of mine who had a radar detector after 2am, and that was around 85 mph. (We were on our way to GenCon.)
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:16 pm
by Aramanthus
Oh ok. That makes sense driving in that open area. But don't you have to be careful of the wildlife?
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:42 pm
by Aramanthus
That stinks! Too bad they couldn't have been better protected from interferring with traffic!
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:41 pm
by Aramanthus
I know, but there should be something done to try and protect it better for the future generations!
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 12:35 am
by Aramanthus
It might work better.
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:52 pm
by Aramanthus
Oh well, that is easier to live with then all of the dead animals.
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:55 am
by Aramanthus
Oh very true!!!!