Forums of the Megaverse®

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:40 am**

this question came to mind. Would they know if you installed a camera in their locker room? I mean... they're blind!

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:34 am**

When you look at their stats I have to say:

1.) Yes they would know
2.) they would then hunt you down and hand you over to their friend with the tenticles.

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:45 am**

I guess it is easier to buy a few of them.

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:07 pm**

And then put a cam in their locker...

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:10 pm**

Or place cameras on their helmets.

Wait, I can't believe I just participated on this thread. :ugh:

~ Josh (

)

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:11 pm**

Josh Sinsapaugh wrote:Wait, I can't believe I just participated on this thread.

~ Josh ( )

Yes you can...and you loved every moment of it...in fact...I'll bet you had momentary flashes of naked blind chicks...

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:12 pm**

well lets see, first off they are blind. So they would have less understanding of visual stimuli and quite possibly would be less offended by Richards crawling around the air ducts with a camera like a bad teen movie character. Second of all and this is important, they reproduce asexually. Meaning they don't do the whole mating dance the rest of us do, and probably don't have more than the most basic understanding of it in the first place.

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:33 pm**

Seeing the fan response, I think it's clear. Apollo needs to take on this scenerio as an art project, immediately.

Is it too late for this to be the animated short?!?!

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:56 pm**

*nasty thoughts, though pleasantly so* 8-)

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:40 pm**

Misfit KotLD wrote:
Jason Richards wrote:Seeing the fan response, I think it's clear. Apollo needs to take on this scenerio as an art project, immediately.

Is it too late for this to be the animated short?!?!

I take this to mean you do not disagree with us.

Disagree with a two page color spread of a BWW locker room scene? What? I don't even understand what "disagree" means in this context.

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:45 pm**

Josh Sinsapaugh wrote:Or place cameras on their helmets.

Wait, I can't believe I just participated on this thread.

~ Josh ( )

I can't believe you didn't start it.

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:52 pm**

Alejandro wrote:
Misfit KotLD wrote:
Jason Richards wrote:
Misfit KotLD wrote:
Jason Richards wrote:Seeing the fan response, I think it's clear. Apollo needs to take on this scenerio as an art project, immediately.

Is it too late for this to be the animated short?!?!

I take this to mean you do not disagree with us.

Disagree with a two page color spread of a BWW locker room scene? What? I don't even understand what "disagree" means in this context.

Disagreement here is solid proof that one is a Non-Traditional Male as defined by TMQ.

It means you're gay.

Then I'm gay as hell...because lesbians suck ass.

2 hot chicks who are only interested in girls? Gee thanks. Now I have to compete with even more men over the remaining women in the world.

I'm sure some do. :lol:

To steal someone else sig of someone elses quote "Hooray for Lesbians".

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:04 pm**

Alejandro wrote:I've noticed that the people who like lesbians the most are married men. Even lesbians don't like lesbians as much as guys who got hitched.

Eh, it probably helps I married a woman who was bi.

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:06 pm**

Man, how many times am I going to have to say this this week...

hahaha. Nxla for the win!!!

Posted: **Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:08 pm**

The Galactus Kid wrote:Man, how many times am I going to have to say this this week...

hahaha. Nxla for the win!!!

Well, todays only tuesday...

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:19 am**

Question: Why, with all the interest, was there no BWW in Rifter #35?

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:35 am**

MrNexx wrote:Question: Why, with all the interest, was there no BWW in Rifter #35?

Haven't seen it yet, but word on the street is that Apollo's new artwork makes up for it.

Besides, even with no BWW... Erin Tarn was no slouch!

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:40 am**

Cain wrote:
MrNexx wrote:Question: Why, with all the interest, was there no BWW in Rifter #35?

Because Jason Richards forgot to tell Apollo to draw us a 2 page BWW locker room spread until yesterday?

(Dude, if you'd done this wonderful market research like, last spring, maybe it would have made it into Rifter #35!)

I'm working on the sequel!!!

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:22 am**

Cain wrote:Suhweeeee3e3ee3eeet!1!11!

Ah-Ha. So you're who had the name.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:15 am**

MrNexx wrote:Question: Why, with all the interest, was there no BWW in Rifter #35?

Hehe, cause I got asked to draw Erin Tarn instead! :lol:

If I had my way, you’d definitely have been seeing some Shemarrian and Blind Warrior action! :fl:

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:11 pm**

Misfit KotLD wrote:
Apollo Okamura wrote:
MrNexx wrote:Question: Why, with all the interest, was there no BWW in Rifter #35?

Hehe, cause I got asked to draw Erin Tarn instead!
If I had my way, you’d definitely have been seeing some Shemarrian and Blind Warrior action!

You need to do that anyway. And not just because my wife played a Shemarrian Pinocchio...

Errr, "Pinocchio"? :erm:

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:44 pm**

Misfit KotLD wrote:You need to do that anyway. And not just because my wife played a Shemarrian Pinocchio...

Great, now I've got this mental image of a Shemarrian doing the Pinnochio dance from Shrek 2 "I'm a real boy! I'm a real boy"

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:47 pm**

Juankis wrote:
Misfit KotLD wrote:You need to do that anyway. And not just because my wife played a Shemarrian Pinocchio...

Great, now I've got this mental image of a Shemarrian doing the Pinnochio dance from Shrek 2 "I'm a real boy! I'm a real boy"

Thanks, now so do I. :nh:

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:50 pm**

Misfit KotLD wrote:
Nxla666 wrote:
Misfit KotLD wrote:
Apollo Okamura wrote:
MrNexx wrote:Question: Why, with all the interest, was there no BWW in Rifter #35?

Hehe, cause I got asked to draw Erin Tarn instead!
If I had my way, you’d definitely have been seeing some Shemarrian and Blind Warrior action!

You need to do that anyway. And not just because my wife played a Shemarrian Pinocchio...

Errr, "Pinocchio"?

The wooden puppet who wanted to be a real boy. Ivori wanted to become a real girl after she realized she was a robot and everything she knew was made up. She did become a real girl, got a girlfriend, made very intimate friends with a prince, and died to save the group. No whales were involved.

I thought something grew every time she lied. :lol:

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:08 pm**

Alejandro wrote:Bah. Immortality and marriage are just 2 things that should never mix. Any kind of prolongued lifespan shouldn't be burdened with monogamy.

I think I shall sig that.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:29 pm**

WOOT! I finally figured out how to do add sigs.
See below!

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:26 am**

Apollo Okamura wrote:WOOT! I finally figured out how to do add sigs.
See below!

Cool.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:56 pm**

Wet Blanket Time....how certain can we be that BWW, reproducing assexually, don't have the anatomical correctness of a Barbie Doll? I.E....the bumps and curves have the right outline and are in the right places, but what hasn't been edited off by biowizardry and atrophy would make a clothing store mannequin look like a Heffner employee in comparison? :demon:

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:33 pm**

Alejandro wrote:
Misfit KotLD wrote:
taalismn wrote:Wet Blanket Time....how certain can we be that BWW, reproducing assexually, don't have the anatomical correctness of a Barbie Doll? I.E....the bumps and curves have the right outline and are in the right places, but what hasn't been edited off by biowizardry and atrophy would make a clothing store mannequin look like a Heffner employee in comparison?

I recall a description that places them as having all the plumbing, but I'll have to get back with you on where I read it.

It's in the Atlantis book in their description

In that case...cast off wet blanket, cue wet teeshirt jokes...

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:59 pm**

Alejandro wrote:Except in that same description it says they never use them and they don't feel attraction to other humanoids and have no use or desire for sex. So while it could be changed for a single character the likelihood of seeing them in anything like that would be about the same probability as the Coalition suddenly starting Operation: Hugs & Kisses and embrace the notion of D-bees on the planet.

It's a world of laughter, a world of cheer...

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:44 am**

Alejandro wrote:Except in that same description it says they never use them and they don't feel attraction to other humanoids and have no use or desire for sex. So while it could be changed for a single character the likelihood of seeing them in anything like that would be about the same probability as the Coalition suddenly starting Operation: Hugs & Kisses and embrace the notion of D-bees on the planet.

Hey, everybody look! It's Mr. Killjoy! <applause>

What this topic lacked was some argumentative discussion about the drawbacks of this completely serious suggestion for a gaming/art concept.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:48 am**

I likes bewbs. Bl1nD W4rr10r womenz R h0tzorz.

There. Back to the previous level of conversation. And, if you're a psychic, you can always use Bio-Manipulation to cause them to be horny.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:51 am**

Jason Richards wrote:
Alejandro wrote:Except in that same description it says they never use them and they don't feel attraction to other humanoids and have no use or desire for sex. So while it could be changed for a single character the likelihood of seeing them in anything like that would be about the same probability as the Coalition suddenly starting Operation: Hugs & Kisses and embrace the notion of D-bees on the planet.

Hey, everybody look! It's Mr. Killjoy! <applause>

What this topic lacked was some argumentative discussion about the drawbacks of this completely serious suggestion for a gaming/art concept.

So thanks for supplying it? He was just responding to a line of thought that someone else brought up, and I didn't find his response terribly argumentative, maybe a bit dry in its humor, but still not argumentative. Maybe we should chill just a wee bit?

EDIT****
Whoops, sorry Nexx. Yea, BEWBS!!! MORE BEWBS PLEASE!

Seriously, I was ticked there were no BWW in the swimsuite issue.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2007 2:56 am**

Apollo Okamura wrote:WOOT! I finally figured out how to do add sigs.
See below!

I stole your siggy pic =)

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:07 am**

Y'all are crazy. I'd use one of those rune statues to record and view everything.

/Sub

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:13 am**

By the way... You guys do realize, that the Blind Warrior Woman pic in my sig is actually a colour sneek peek from the new D-Bees book? :-D

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:14 am**

Apollo Okamura wrote:By the way... You guys do realize, that the Blind Warrior Woman pic in my sig is actually a colour sneek peek from the new D-Bees book?

OH DEAR GOD.

Thankfully, I've already ordered it.

And everything else.

Twice over in most cases.

/Sub

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:41 am**

Misfit KotLD wrote:
Apollo Okamura wrote:By the way... You guys do realize, that the Blind Warrior Woman pic in my sig is actually a colour sneek peek from the new D-Bees book?

Damn. Maybe I do need that book.

Apollo for teh winz!!1!!

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:08 am**

Misfit KotLD wrote:
Shadyslug wrote:
Josh Sinsapaugh wrote:Wait, I can't believe I just participated on this thread.

~ Josh ( )

Yes you can...and you loved every moment of it...in fact...I'll bet you had momentary flashes of naked blind chicks...

Well, the BWWs kill three fetishes at once. The disabled chick, the bald chick, and the amazon chick fetish all in one.

*Edit* I forgot the hairless thing.

You forgot Lingere and all women species... unless that was part of the amazon.

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:02 pm**

Misfit KotLD wrote:
Apollo Okamura wrote:By the way... You guys do realize, that the Blind Warrior Woman pic in my sig is actually a colour sneek peek from the new D-Bees book?

Damn. Maybe I do need that book.

I definitely need the book now =)

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:33 pm**

If the D-Bee book has a decent picture of BWW, I will get another tattoo to complement my: Rurga tattoo, my Isis tattoo, my Sorceress (from nightbane), my General Loni Kashbrook tattoo, and my bar maid from new west =)

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:06 pm**

Noven, the BWW in my sig IS the picture from the D-Bees book, it's just in colour.
Since the BWW is all tones and no line art it might be a bit more difficult to get tattooed though.

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:38 pm**

duck-foot wrote:750+ views people must really wanna see this locker room pic. i can understand i do to. when this pic gets done it needs to be posted online.

While I would like to see this locker room picture I much prefer a real woman like my friend, Teirdes.

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:51 pm**

Apollo Okamura wrote:Noven, the BWW in my sig IS the picture from the D-Bees book, it's just in colour.
Since the BWW is all tones and no line art it might be a bit more difficult to get tattooed though.

Naw, my tattoo artist is pretty good =)

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:07 pm**

Locker room pic!? What, who? Okay, what's rat_bastard gotten me into now? :shock:

Sorry guys, I don't have any locker room pics. :-?

...'course, if Palladium does another swimsuit issue... :-P

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:07 pm**

Subjugator wrote:Y'all are crazy. I'd use one of those rune statues to record and view everything.

/Sub

:ok:

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:14 pm**

Apollo Okamura wrote:Locker room pic!? What, who? Okay, what's rat_bastard gotten me into now?
Sorry guys, I don't have any locker room pics.

...'course, if Palladium does another swimsuit issue...

Well that would be an idea to help with PB's financial troubles haha

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:22 pm**

Look I loved the concept of a Swimsuit issue, and I love smut, but the next swimsuit rifter has got to have more substance, you can only go so far with pictures of pretty women.

oh, and I know I am losing hetro points for this,m but put in somthing for the ladies, I mean really people....

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:24 pm**

rat_bastard wrote:Look I loved the concept of a Swimsuit issue, and I love smut, but the next swimsuit rifter has got to have more substance, you can only go so far with pictures of pretty women.

oh, and I know I am losing hetro points for this,m but put in somthing for the ladies, I mean really people....

Haha, Karl Prosec in a bathing suit haha. Or Lord Coake! Or even....splyncryth. Definitly a Grackle Tooth and a Cactus Person.

Posted: **Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:29 pm**

rat_bastard wrote:Look I loved the concept of a Swimsuit issue, and I love smut, but the next swimsuit rifter has got to have more substance, you can only go so far with pictures of pretty women.

oh, and I know I am losing hetro points for this,m but put in somthing for the ladies, I mean really people....

Pfft, they've already gotten how many shots of naked male D-bess and Demons?

Splugorth are always naked!

Forums of the Megaverse®

With all the talk of Blind Warrior Women art lately...

With all the talk of Blind Warrior Women art lately...