vitae_drinker wrote:Killer Cyborg wrote:I wouldn't have commented on it at all, only I was asked how I ran Japan in my game.
Then Doom asked me how I would rather things be.
I don't think that your suggested responce would really have answered either question.
Actually...
vitae_dinker wrote:
"I disagree with the way that Palladium has done Rifts, but I still play it and still buy their books. Thank you."
I think it does.
Much more succinct, but I do believe it answers both questions, although without a great deal of detail. Maybe with the addition of "I believe that Rifts should be more like Mad Max, which is the way I run it."
And then the "Thank you".
![Big Grin :D](./images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Let's try that and see how it works:
RainOfSteel wrote:KC, I eagerly await the product of your imagination describing your set up in Japan.
"I disagree with the way that Palladium has done Rifts, but I still play it and still buy their books. Thank you."
No... that really does absolutely nothing to address the issue at hand.
See, he was asking for a
description of how I imagine Japan would be... and your "answer" doesn't answer that.
It's more of a politically correct evasion than an answer... like when a politician is asked about taxes and responds with "I'm a patriot and I love this country."
It's all very nice and everything, just irrelevent to the question.
Since I like and respect RainOfSteel, I'd much rather just answer his question than evade it with irrelevent political correctness.
But maybe you were talking about Doom's question,
It's been 300 years.
You want stagnation instead of rebuilding?
"I disagree with the way that Palladium has done Rifts, but I still play it and still buy their books. Thank you."
No... that still doesn't work.
See, Doom is asking my preference of gameworld and implying that he finds "stagnation" boring.
So I addressed his question and explained that my preference is for realism.
Since he was not asking:
a) Whether or not I agree with everthing that Palladium has done with Rifts (and he knows that I do not... neither does he, for that matter)
b) Whether I still play Rifts
or
c) Whether or not I still buy Palladium products
Your proposed answer really does nothing to answer the questions that were actually asked.
In any case, the point of this thread is NOT about how well I respond to people's questions, and it's NOT about whether or not I buy Palladium products, let's get things back on track.
The topic is this:
Kevin Siembieda originally envisioned Japan has having been destroyed and turned into a
quiet chain of wilderness islands.
The Rifts Japan book is a definite
change from that original version of things.
That's all.
And it's rather puzzling to me why anybody would claim otherwise. Whether or not you like Rifts Japan, it's obviously not what KS originally had in mind. If you like it, then it's a good change. If you don't like it, then it's a bad change.
But it's still a change.