Page 1 of 1

Pulse shots

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:18 pm
by Grafsburg
This is probably a bit of a newbie-ish question, but do you still halve your strike bonus when making a pulse shot?

I guess the best example would be if using a Coalition assault rifle or (in my case) a Wilks 447 Pulse Rifle. Since it's described as being three near-simultaneous shots, I figured you wouldn't take a strike penalty, but maybe I'm wrong.

The GM seems to flip-flop between allowing it and not allowing it, and he admitted he's not sure if that's the case either. So I
figured I'd ask on here and see what everyone else thought :D.

Re: Pulse shots

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:36 pm
by rat_bastard
remember there is a cumulative 33% chance that after every pulse blast the gun explodes doing 3d6x100 damage over a 90 foot radius.

Re: Pulse shots

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:00 pm
by azazel1024
rat_bastard wrote:remember there is a cumulative 33% chance that after every pulse blast the gun explodes doing 3d6x100 damage over a 90 foot radius.


Means there is a 1% chance that my russian roulette loving crazy PC is going to get his wish.

You can bet which way the dice are going to roll every single time.

Grrrr.
-Matt

Re: Pulse shots

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:17 am
by filo_clarke
sybert1138 wrote:
rat_bastard wrote:remember there is a cumulative 33% chance that after every pulse blast the gun explodes doing 3d6x100 damage over a 90 foot radius.


But isn't there a 98% chance that 75% of rat-bastards statistics are made up 50% of the time?


80% of board posters know that.

Re: Pulse shots

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:36 am
by The Galactus Kid
sybert1138 wrote:
Laux the Ogre wrote:
filo_clarke wrote:
sybert1138 wrote:
rat_bastard wrote:remember there is a cumulative 33% chance that after every pulse blast the gun explodes doing 3d6x100 damage over a 90 foot radius.


But isn't there a 98% chance that 75% of rat-bastards statistics are made up 50% of the time?


80% of board posters know that.

But only 67% of posters that know that will admit to it, and even then only 74% of the time.



So if my math is right that should mean that rat-bastard is really KS pretending to be another poster...

It is safe to assume that the math is NEVER right.